Malignant haemangiopericytomas of omentum presenting as left inguinal hernia: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Hemangiopericytomas (HPC) are vascular tumors and can be found at any place where vessels are present. These were previously known as 'extrapleural Solitary Fibrous Tumour'. These tumors may reoccur and metastasize after surgical excision. We present herein a HPC of the greater omentum, diagnosed as left inguinal hernia preoperatively. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old male, presented with a huge painless mass in his left inguinoscrotal region secondary to weigh-lifting associated with malaise and vague abdominal pain. A well-defined, non-tender, and firm mass was found at the left lower abdomen extending to the left inguinoscrotal region. Based on the examination, a diagnosis of indirect inguinal hernia was made. Abdominal ultrasound showed a heterogeneous, hyporeflective, and vascularized mass. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan identified a localized, extraperitoneal, heterogeneously hypodense, well-defined, and lobulated mass, with marked contrast enhancement. On exploration, an encapsulated large mass originating from the omentum with enormously dilated blood vessels was excised. On histopathology, a neoplastic lesion, composed of spindle-shaped cells and moderate cytoplasm was identified. The blood vessels appeared thin-walled with a staghorn appearance in hemangiopericytic pattern. Omental sections showed fibro adipose tissue with dilated lymphatics and thick-walled blood vessels. Features were consistent with a malignant HPC of 20 × 14 × 10 cm. CONCLUSION: We present an unusual presentation of primary omental malignant HPC as an inguinal hernia, treated by complete surgical resection. These tumors are rare therefore, timely diagnosis is important for proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. It also requires long-term follow up for better survival.

A rare case of idiopathic ileocolic intussusception in an adult.

Intussusception is an invagination of one segment of the bowel into its adjoining segment. In children, the cause is usually benign, while in adults it is secondary to a mass lesion. Here we present a case in which the preoperative diagnosis of intussusception secondary to colonic mass was made, but no definitive cause was identified by histopathology. A 30-year-old male presented with abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, weight loss, loose motions, bleeding per rectum, and vomiting. The abdomen was distended, firm, mildly tender, and guarded. A vague mass of 15 × 10 cm was palpated on the left upper quadrant. X-ray and ultrasound showed dilated small bowel. A computed tomography scan suggested ileoileal intussusception. Colonoscopy showed a growth at 15 cm of the anal verge. Exploratory laparotomy was performed, showing the presence of ileocolic intussusception with two large perforations. Subtotal colectomy with ileostomy was done. The histopathological examination showed signs of perforation.

Use of Abdominal Binders after a Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective To compare the effect of abdominal binder versus no binder after major abdominal surgery and cesarean section on various post-operative recovery parameters. Materials and methods This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of General Surgery and Obstetrics, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. All those patients aged ≥18 years having abdominal surgery including elective and emergency abdominal surgery and cesarean sections with American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III were included in the study. Randomization was done using the sealed envelope method by the principal investigator. The intervention group wore an abdominal binder postoperatively while the control group did not use it. Mobilization and the pain status of both groups were evaluated on the first, fourth, and seventh days after surgery. Results Primary outcome variables were mobility, assessed via 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and postoperative pain, evaluated via visual analogue scale. There was no statistically significant difference in the 6MWT distance before (p = 0.278) and on postoperative day one of the surgery (p = 0.0762). However, the difference was significant on fourth (p < 0.001) and seventh day (p value < 0.001). With regards to the pain status, patients in the binder group reported significantly less postoperative pain on first, fourth, and seventh (p value < 0.001) day compared to the non-binder group. Conclusion The use of abdominal binder postoperatively significantly reduced pain and improved mobility in both obstetric and surgery patients.